Brighthouse Life Insurance Denied Your Claim?
If your policy was originally sold under the MetLife name, it may now be a Brighthouse policy — MetLife spun off its individual life insurance and annuity business into Brighthouse Financial in 2017. Regulators in at least two states have found Brighthouse failed to meet basic requirements for handling life insurance death claims, and a federal class action over how it calculates cost-of-insurance charges is now headed toward a $9.25 million settlement.
On This Page
Who Is Brighthouse, and Is This Really a MetLife Policy?
Brighthouse Financial (NYSE: BHF) is the successor to MetLife's U.S. retail life insurance and annuity business, spun off as an independent company in August 2017. If your policy was originally sold under the MetLife name — including policies that were once called "MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut" or "MetLife Insurance Company USA" — it may have been transferred to Brighthouse and is now serviced and decided by Brighthouse, not MetLife.
Individual life policies are sold through independent agents, brokers, and financial advisors, and are governed by state insurance law. Group or worksite life coverage sold through an employer or association is generally an ERISA-governed plan instead, unless structured as a non-ERISA voluntary plan.
Regulatory History on Life Claims Handling
Two state insurance departments have formally examined Brighthouse Life Insurance Company's claims practices in recent years and found specific violations tied to life insurance death claims.
Following a market conduct examination, Brighthouse consented to a $20,000 fine for violations including ten producers acting as agents without required appointment, failure to pay certain claims in a timely manner, and failure to pay interest on claims not paid on time — violations of Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-702m.
Of 76 individual life claim files reviewed from a population of 385, examiners found 4 instances where Brighthouse failed to provide the beneficiary a written explanation for a claim delay beyond 45 days, and 4 instances where it failed to include the required Notice of Availability of the Department of Insurance — both violations of 50 Ill. Admin. Code 919.70(a)(2).
We found no additional state enforcement orders specifically naming Brighthouse for unfair life death-claim handling beyond these two.
Litigation
A certified class action alleging Brighthouse breached universal life insurance contracts by failing to decrease cost-of-insurance rates despite improving mortality experience, as its own policy language promised. The court certified a class in 2025, and the parties have since asked the court to preliminarily approve a $9.25 million settlement. This case concerns policy pricing, not a refusal to pay a death claim.
A policyholder argued his policy violated Minnesota's Readability of Insurance Policies Act by using language that wasn't easily understandable. The Eighth Circuit affirmed dismissal, holding the statute doesn't create a private right of action — enforcement is reserved to Minnesota's Commissioner of Commerce. This case involved a readability and unjust-enrichment claim, not a denied or rescinded death benefit.
We found no controlling appellate or Supreme Court decision specifically addressing Brighthouse's handling of a life insurance death claim, and no recent published decision applying a discretionary clause or choice-of-law dispute to a Brighthouse life claim specifically.
Brighthouse's Position in the Life Insurance Market
According to the NAIC's 2024 Life and Fraternal Market Share Report, Brighthouse did not rank among the top 25 U.S. life insurers by countrywide premium — the 25th-ranked company held roughly 1.10% market share, meaning Brighthouse's share is below that.
The NAIC's report does not publish state-by-state or individual-versus-group premium breakdowns for a specific company, so no state-concentration or product-line claim is made here.
Governing Law
Employer-Sponsored Group Life
- Generally governed by ERISA
- 29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1 requires reasonable written claim and appeal procedures, including specific deadlines and denial-notice content
- As claims administrator, Brighthouse must comply with these procedures on ERISA-governed plans
Individual Life Policies
- Generally governed by state insurance and contract law
- State contestability, lapse-notice, and bad-faith statutes apply instead of ERISA's federal claims procedure
- Which state's law applies depends on the policy and the actual facts
California Life Insurance Law
Contestability
Cal. Ins. Code § 10113.5 makes an individual life policy incontestable after two years in force during the insured's lifetime, except for nonpayment of premium. Brighthouse generally cannot deny a death claim after two years on grounds of misstatement, absent a fraud exception.
Discretionary Clauses Are Void
Cal. Ins. Code § 10110.6 voids any life or disability insurance provision giving the insurer discretion to interpret the contract or decide claims — meaning no special judicial deference is owed to Brighthouse's own claim decisions on a qualifying policy.
Grace Period & Lapse Notice
California requires at least a 60-day grace period for a missed premium, which does not run concurrently with any period of paid coverage already remaining (Cal. Ins. Code § 10113.71), alongside the related lapse-notice framework in § 10113.72 that the California Supreme Court held in McHugh v. Protective Life Insurance Co., 12 Cal. 5th 213 (2021), applies even to policies already in force when those statutes took effect on January 1, 2013.
Bad Faith
California's bad-faith remedy is the common-law implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Gruenberg v. Aetna Insurance Co., 9 Cal. 3d 566 (1973)) — not a private right of action under the Unfair Claims Practices Act, Cal. Ins. Code § 790.03, which is enforced only by the state itself.
What the Data Actually Shows
The two regulatory findings and two lawsuits above are real and verified. Beyond them, we looked specifically for a broader pattern of Brighthouse-specific life insurance denial or rescission practices and found the record thinner than the confirmed items above.
None of this proves these things haven't happened — it means we couldn't verify a specific case or finding to the standard we hold ourselves to. What's clearly and independently verified: two state regulators have found real claims-handling violations, and Brighthouse is currently facing a certified class action headed toward a multi-million-dollar settlement over how it prices in-force policies.
Frequently Asked Questions
Very possibly. MetLife spun off its individual life insurance and annuity business into Brighthouse Financial in August 2017. If your policy predates that spinoff, it may have been transferred to Brighthouse Life Insurance Company or Brighthouse Life Insurance Company of NY, which now services and decides claims on it — regardless of what name appears on your original paperwork.
Yes, in two states. Connecticut's Insurance Department fined Brighthouse $20,000 in a 2023 consent order for failing to pay certain claims and required interest on time, among other violations. Illinois's Department of Insurance found Brighthouse failed to provide beneficiaries required delay notices on individual life claims in a 2020 market conduct exam.
Yes — Martin v. Brighthouse Life Insurance Company, a certified federal class action alleging Brighthouse improperly failed to lower cost-of-insurance rates on universal life policies as mortality improved. A $9.25 million settlement is currently pending court approval. This case is about policy pricing, not a denied death claim, but it may be relevant if you own a Brighthouse universal life policy.
It depends on how you obtained it. An individual policy purchased through an agent or advisor is generally governed by state insurance law. Group or worksite life coverage obtained through an employer is usually ERISA-governed instead, which comes with its own federal claims and appeal procedure under 29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1.
If your policy has been in force for more than two years, Cal. Ins. Code § 10113.5 generally makes it incontestable, meaning Brighthouse cannot rescind it over an application misstatement except in narrow fraud circumstances. California also voids discretionary-authority clauses in life policies under § 10110.6, so no special deference is owed to Brighthouse's own claim decision.
Brighthouse directs beneficiaries to call its claims department to report a death — 800-882-1292 for most policies, though some legacy policy series use different numbers. Brighthouse mails claim forms after the call rather than offering a blank form for download online, and generally requires a completed claim form, a certified death certificate, and proof of identity, plus estate or trust paperwork if a trustee or executor is filing.
Meet the Author
Denied or Delayed by Brighthouse?
Tell us what happened and what your denial letter says. We'll tell you honestly what your options are, including whether recent regulatory findings or litigation are relevant to your situation. The consultation is free.