Reliance Standard Denied Your Life Insurance Claim?
Dorian Law represents beneficiaries nationwide in disputes with Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company — sometimes shortened to "RSL," though rarely in their own correspondence. A pattern is recognizable in these cases: Reliance Standard collected premiums, month after month, through a policy your employer set up on your behalf. You held up your end. Then someone you loved passed away, a death benefit came due, and the same company that never missed a premium payment suddenly found a reason it didn't have to pay it out.
Sound familiar? We help you say:
If your coverage came through an employer plan, the clock may already be running. Federal law requires most ERISA life and AD&D plans to give claimants at least 60 days to appeal a denial — far shorter than the 180-day window many people assume applies to every benefits dispute. Missing it can end your case before it starts.
Where Are You Right Now?
Reliance Standard disputes generally fall into three very different stages.
Making a Claim
You want to get a claim filed correctly the first time.
Help Making a Claim →Reliance Standard Denied the Claim
You have a denial letter and need to understand your right to appeal — and how much time you actually have.
Appeal the Right Way →Reliance Standard Denied My Appeal
Your appeal was denied too. For most people, that means the next step is a lawsuit. Dorian Law was built for litigation.
Let Dorian Law Sue RSL →A Major Player in the Employer-Sponsored Life Market
Reliance Standard operates as part of Tokio Marine Holdings, Inc. Group in NAIC market share reporting. According to the 2024 NAIC Life and Fraternal Market Share Report, Tokio Marine Holdings ranked 15th nationally among group life insurers by direct written premium.
Tokio Marine Holdings wrote $664,009,295 in direct group life premium nationwide in 2024 — a 1.49% national market share. Reliance Standard's book has historically been concentrated among employers with 10 to 1,000 employees, sold through independent brokers, and it writes almost exclusively through employer-sponsored plans rather than individual, direct-to-consumer policies.
Source: 2024 NAIC Life and Fraternal Insurance Industry Market Share Report, Group Life — States, U.S. Territories, Canada, Aggregate Other Alien.
That's the reason almost every Reliance Standard life claim is governed by ERISA rather than ordinary state insurance law — and why the 60-day appeal clock matters to most people reading this page.
Which Reliance Standard Entity Denied the Claim?
"Reliance Standard" is a brand name, not one legal entity. Both companies below are owned by Delphi Financial Group and, since 2012, Tokio Marine Holdings.
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Home office in Schaumburg, Illinois. Licensed in every state except New York, plus D.C., Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam.
First Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Home office in Manhattan. Licensed in New York and Delaware — a separate legal entity under the same corporate parent.
The correct entity matters for venue and who is properly named if litigation becomes necessary. We confirm it before an appeal is filed, not after.
How Long Do You Have to Appeal?
Under 29 C.F.R. § 2560.503-1, a claim for a life insurance or AD&D benefit is not treated the same as a group health or disability claim. Group health and disability plans must give claimants at least 180 days to appeal. Life and AD&D plans only have to give at least 60 days — a floor that's easy to assume is longer than it is, especially if you've read about disability appeal deadlines elsewhere.
This estimates the federal regulatory floor only. Your specific plan may allow more time — the exact deadline should be stated in your denial letter or plan document. This is not legal advice, and it isn't a substitute for confirming the actual date with a licensed attorney.
Stage One: Making a Claim
If you haven't filed yet, the most important thing to know is that what you submit now becomes part of the record Reliance Standard — and later, if necessary, a federal court — will use to evaluate the claim. Reliance Standard's claims process is straightforward on its face:
What Reliance Standard Requires
- The policy number, or the deceased's full name, employer, and date of birth if the policy number isn't available
- A certified copy of the death certificate
- A completed claim form, submitted through Reliance Standard's claims portal, by email, or by fax
Reliance Standard's claims portal is hosted at reliancematrix.com; claim forms can also be submitted by email to ClaimsIntake@rsli.com or by fax to 267-256-4262.
Keep a copy of everything you submit, and note the exact date you file. If the claim is later denied, that history matters.
For a full walkthrough of best practices when filing a life insurance claim — with any insurer, not just Reliance Standard — see our general guide.
General Life Insurance Claim Guide →Do I need a lawyer to file a life insurance claim with Reliance Standard?
No, not usually. A straightforward claim — clear cause of death, no lapse or eligibility questions, no pre-existing condition disputes — can typically be filed without an attorney. It's worth talking to one earlier only if there's a specific reason to expect a denial.
Stage Two: Reliance Standard Denied the Claim
A denial letter is not the end of the process — it's the start of a formal, time-limited right to appeal. Because most Reliance Standard life and AD&D coverage is provided through an employer plan, that appeal is governed by ERISA, and it comes with two things worth understanding immediately.
First, the deadline. Life and AD&D appeals require a minimum of only 60 days under federal regulation — use the calculator above if you haven't already to see roughly where you stand.
Second, the record. In most ERISA cases, if this dispute ever reaches a federal court, the judge will generally only review the same written record that existed at the end of the internal appeal — not new evidence introduced later. That makes the appeal itself, not a future lawsuit, the most important opportunity to add medical records, vocational evidence, expert opinions, or anything else that contradicts Reliance Standard's stated reason for denial.
That's true whatever the stated reason for the denial — a disputed cause of death, a missing enrollment step, a policy exclusion, or a procedural issue with how the claim was reviewed.
My life insurance claim was denied by Reliance Standard. Do I need to hire an attorney to appeal?
No, but this is the time to seriously consider hiring one. The stakes at this stage are exceptionally high: in most ERISA cases, the administrative record closes once the internal appeal is decided, and that record is generally all the evidence a federal court will ever see. This is the last realistic opportunity to add medical records, vocational evidence, or expert opinions to the file — not after a lawsuit has already been filed.
That's also exactly why engaging an attorney now, rather than after a lawsuit is filed, tends to make the most practical sense. Most ERISA attorneys, including Dorian Law, work on contingency — no fee unless the case recovers. Dorian Law's contingency rate is generally lower for cases brought to us at this stage, before litigation has begun, than for cases where a lawsuit is already underway. Bringing us in now costs you nothing to explore, and it's the point in the process where an attorney's involvement can still shape the record itself, not just argue about what's already in it.
This is also the point where Dorian Law's approach differs from simply hiring a lawyer to write a letter. Our firm's methodology — what we call the Litigation Back Approach — works backward from how courts actually decide cases, and builds the administrative record to that standard from the outset, rather than making short sighted reactions to Reliance Standard's denial.
Stage Three: Reliance Standard Denied My Appeal
Reliance Standard denied my appeal, and I didn't have a lawyer for it. Is it too late to get help?
No. If your appeal was developed using the Litigation Back Approach, the record going into a lawsuit should already reflect what a federal court is looking for. But even if it wasn't — even if the appeal was handled without an attorney, or by counsel unfamiliar with ERISA's specific procedural traps — an attorney experienced in life insurance denials and with Reliance Standard will often be willing to take on your case. Dorian Law frequently helps people after they, or another law firm, handled the appeal.
When the Case Goes to Litigation
Dorian Law has taken on cases that other attorneys declined, specifically because our deep, carrier-specific knowledge of how insurers like Reliance Standard build and defend denials lets us find arguments a more general practice might miss. That's a direct consequence of narrow practice focus — this is what we do, and largely all we do.
How Federal Courts Have Evaluated Reliance Standard's Denials
Reliance Standard denies life and AD&D claims for a range of stated reasons — a missing enrollment step, a policy exclusion, a disputed cause of death, a procedural technicality. Two patterns show up often enough in the case law to be worth knowing about specifically.
When the Denial Rests on an Enrollment or Paperwork Gap
Reliance Standard sometimes denies a claim on the ground that a required form — commonly Evidence of Insurability — was never completed or approved, even though premiums were deducted from every paycheck up until the date of death. Courts have pushed back on this more than once.
Skelton v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co.
33 F.4th 968 (8th Cir. 2022)The Eighth Circuit held that Reliance Standard, as the plan's claims-review fiduciary, breached its ERISA duties of prudence and loyalty by maintaining an enrollment system that let it collect premiums for years without ever confirming the required approval was in place — then denying the claim on that same missing approval after the insured died.
Cho v. First Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co.
852 F. App'x 304 (9th Cir. 2021)The Ninth Circuit reached a similar result against First Reliance Standard, where an employer had collected premiums from an employee for over a year despite an unsubmitted enrollment form.
When Reliance Standard Is Reviewing Its Own Decision
Reliance Standard typically acts as both the party paying the claim and the party deciding whether to pay it — a structural conflict of interest the Supreme Court has said courts must weigh when reviewing a denial.
Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Glenn
554 U.S. 105 (2008)The Supreme Court held that when an ERISA plan administrator both evaluates and pays claims, that conflict of interest is a factor courts must weigh in deciding whether a denial was an abuse of discretion — more so where the administrator's decision-making process shows other irregularities.
Group Policy or Individual Conversion Policy? It Changes What You Can Recover
Reliance Standard's group policies typically end when employment ends — unless the insured converts to an individual policy first. That conversion matters more than it looks like it should:
ERISA-Governed Group Policy
Remedies are largely equitable: the benefit itself, plus possible attorney's fees. Under Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 560 U.S. 242 (2010), a claimant does not need to be a "prevailing party" to recover fees — only some degree of success on the merits, such as a remand. Punitive damages are not available.
Individual Conversion Policy
Courts have generally treated a converted individual policy as outside ERISA once the employer's role in the plan ends. That can open the door to state bad-faith remedies — in California, for example, Brandt v. Superior Court, 37 Cal. 3d 813 (1985) fees and Civil Code § 3294 punitive damages, both unavailable in an ERISA case.
Frequently Asked Questions
I Want the Best Life Insurance Attorney. Why Should I Hire Dorian Law?
Rather than asking you to take our word for it, here's what's actually verifiable.
The Litigation Back Approach
Dorian Law is known for the Litigation Back Approach — an innovative methodology that works backward from how federal courts actually evaluate ERISA and insurance denial cases, building the administrative record to that standard from the outset rather than reacting to a denial after the fact.
Track Record
- Decades of experience handling exactly this type of case — insurance denial and ERISA benefit litigation
- Hundreds of cases resolved, with tens of millions of dollars recovered for clients
- Wins secured both at the administrative appeal stage and in federal court
Recognition
- Named a Top Attorney by Los Angeles Magazine, 2026
- Selected as a Super Lawyer every year since 2017
- Named a Rising Star, 2014–2016
- 10.0 rating on Avvo — the highest possible
- Multiple Avvo Clients' Choice Award honors
- 5.0 rating on Google (17 reviews) and 5.0 on Yelp (3 reviews)
- 4.9 rating on Avvo across 49 client reviews
Speaking & Publishing
- Invited speaker at ABA conferences on life insurance litigation
- Invited speaker at the Beverly Hills Bar Association on ERISA
- Published author, Plaintiff Magazine
Fees Done the Right Way
We work on contingency and we pride ourselves on being transparent about exactly what that means — not every firm publishes this in plain language before you ever pick up the phone. Read how much it typically costs to hire an insurance lawyer to handle a denied claim.
An Honest Approach to Testimonials
We also take an unusually transparent approach to how we present client experiences on this site. Read our approach to sharing client experiences.
Denied by Reliance Standard?
Wherever you are in the process — filing, appealing, or already denied twice — tell us what happened and we'll tell you, honestly, what your options are.
Schedule a Free ConsultationThis page is attorney advertising and provides general information only; it is not legal advice and does not create an attorney-client relationship. The deadline calculator above estimates the federal regulatory floor only and is not a substitute for confirming your actual deadline with a licensed attorney. Outcomes described elsewhere on this site depend on the specific facts of each case and are not a guarantee or prediction of results in any future matter.