Explore Dorian Law’s Track Record of Success

Results That Speak for Themselves

I am very satisfied with the service that was extended to me by Brent Brehm...on my claims for my late husband’s accidental death benefit. Brent was always ready and available to answer all my questions and had excellently represented me to the insurance company.
— Posted by Amy S.

What Does "Proven Track Record" Mean at Dorian Law?

It’s About Victories, Experience, and Consistent Success.

Dorian Law offers a proven path to success. Our track record demonstrates a consistent ability to overcome insurance company obstacles and secure the benefits our clients deserve, giving you the confidence you need to fight for your rights.

When you are facing a legal battle with a powerful insurance company, you need more than just a lawyer – you need a winner. You need a legal team with a proven record of success in cases just like yours. At Dorian Law, we don't just talk about being effective advocates; we demonstrate it through concrete results. It’s about achieving favorable outcomes for our clients – securing wrongfully denied benefits, holding insurance companies accountable, and making a real difference in people's lives. Our history of victories speaks volumes, offering you confidence and assurance that you are in capable hands.

Here are just a few:

  • Leetzow v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 2016 WL 7324092

    Los Angeles Federal Court

    Trial Judgment for Plaintiff involving disability claim due to chronic migraines and frequent headaches. Plaintiff was a former director of sales management who was unable to work when she had a migraine, but able to work when she did not have a migraine. MetLife argued there was no objective evidence of disability. Brent Dorian Brehm argued that Plaintiff’s disability was due to an inability to consistently attend work when she had a migraine. The Court agreed with Mr. Brehm.

  • Elliott v. Life Insurance Co., of North America, 2019 WL 2970843

San Francisco Federal Court

Trial Judgment for Plaintiff involving disability due to trigeminal neuralgia. Judge Maxine M. Chesney found the legal arguments and medical evidence compelled a finding of disability.

  • Roberts v. Anthem Life Insurance Co., 2017 WL 2469354

Los Angeles Federal Court

Judge granted Plaintiff’s motion for remand in case involving disability due a traumatic brain injury. The Court agreed with argument that Anthem had committed several procedural irregularities warranting a remand for further consideration of the claim. On remand the claim was approved, and counsel negotiated a settlement regarding additional attorneys’ fees.

  • Holmgren v. Sun Life and Health Ins. Co., 354 F. Supp. 3d 1018

Oakland Federal Court

Trial Judgment for Plaintiff involving disability due to back/hip/buttock pain of unknown etiology. Judge Gonzalez Rogers agreed with our position on a wide swath of issues, new and old, that appear in today’s ERISA long-term disability cases, including that social media activity was not evidence of work capacity, how pre-disability work performance reviews factor into a disability analysis, that surveillance is not always evidence of work capacity, how to evaluate subjective complaints of pain in the absence of an objectively verifiable cause for the pain, how to evaluate an insurer’s reliance on peer review opinions over examining physician’s opinions, and why physical “sedentary capacity” is not the equivalent to the ability to work a sedentary occupation.

  • Mondolo v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America, 2013 WL 178711

    Orange County Federal Court

    Trial Judgment for Plaintiff involving fibromyalgia and avascular necrosis where it was established that Plaintiff was disabled from sedentary work and that Unum’s conflict of interest was a factor leading to the termination of benefits.

  • Peterson v. AT&T Umbrella Ben. Plan No. 1, 2011 WL 5882877

    San Francisco Federal Court

    Trial Judgment for Plaintiff in self-funded, “full” abuse of discretion case involving chronic fatigue syndrome and attempts to adopt a child.

  • LaVertu v. Unum Life Ins. Co. of America, 2014 WL 1224736

    Orange County Federal Court

    Trial Judgment for Plaintiff involving disability claim following three spine surgeries where it was established that sedentary work requires more than “frequent” sitting as that term is defined by the Department of Labor. Court also found that part-time work capacity was not a valid basis for terminating benefits.

  • Harder v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. Long Term Disability Plan, 281 F. Supp. 3d 939

Los Angeles Federal Court

Trial Judgment for Plaintiff in “full” abuse of discretion case involving disability claim due to depression, anxiety, PTSD, and physical disorders. Brent Dorian Brehm had handled the administrative appeal prior to litigation. Judge Percy Anderson agreed with Mr. Brehm that Aetna had continually shifted the reason for the denial as prior reasons were disprove and its termination of benefits was illogical.

  • Porco v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America, 682 F.Supp.2d 1057

Los Angeles Federal Court

Trial Judgment for Plaintiff in case where it was proven Plaintiff was disabled due to back pain despite surveillance and vocational review findings.

For us, a Proven Track Record is not just about past wins; although there are many. It’s about a consistent commitment to excellence, a deep understanding of insurance law, and a relentless dedication to achieving the best possible results for every client, every time. Here’s how our Proven Track Record benefits you:

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) About Dorian Law’s Proven Track Record

Contact Dorian Law today for a free consultation. Let us show you how we can make the difference in your case.

Choose a Winner. Choose Experience. Choose Dorian Law.